Building capacity for sustainable development: access to healthcare system in South Korea for North Korean refugees

March 15, 2014 – LeAnn Noh

North Korea is one of the most oppressive countries in the world, where the autocratic regime takes control of every aspect of people’s lives.  Driven by the brutal violation of human rights, lifelong indoctrination, poverty and hunger, in 2010 alone, more than 3000 North Koreans fled North Korea to enter South Korea by covert and treacherous means.

In their journey, many experience extreme trauma ranging from human trafficking, torture, loss of family members and other life-threatening situations.  Moreover, their hardship does not end when they arrive in South Korea.  Understandably, they suffer from various mental health illnesses such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They also find it difficult to assimilate to the unfamiliar environment in South Korea, a society that has taken a very different course since the Korean War. Furthermore, lack of family and social support exacerbates the feeling of isolation and loneliness for North Korean refugees that settle in South Korea.

Though the South Korean government grants citizenship and provides extended healthcare benefits to North Korean who enter South Korea, many struggle to take advantage of the healthcare system. From the first step of identifying providers to navigating the referral system, North Koreans face difficulties digesting the vast difference between the healthcare systems in the two Koreas. This impedes the timely and proper treatment of various conditions they have including the mental health needs mentioned above.

TOOK, the Organization for One Korea, has been providing hospital-based counseling for the past seven years. The counselors are North Korean defectors who underwent training and received certificate from TOOK. Based on four hospitals in South Korea, the counselors offer assistance to North Koreans in navigating the South Korean healthcare system. Starting with the initial counseling of personal history and health assessment, the counselors help the patients get referrals from primary hospitals, comprehend communication with doctors and nurses to schedule hospitalization and discharge. The counselor also provide social support by visiting the hospitalize patients as family members would. Moreover, the North Korean patients form lasting social ties at the counselor office and share information on life in South Korea.

The counseling program is an example of a sustainable development initiative that not only trains the new population with skills (counseling for North Korea related programs are on high demand as the number of defectors continue to increase), but also help the individuals receive the benefits of the social services  available. To learn more, visit TOOK’s website at www.saejowi.org.

 

Battle for Foreign Direct Investment in Asia

Jan. 14, 2014 – Julian M. Hill

Asian countries positioning to attract more foreign capital, but at what cost?

Last month, E&Y (formally Ernst & Young) gave India an early Christmas present, apparently crowning India as the most attractive destination in the world for foreign direct investment (FDI). In the world, E&Y said! Besides its depreciating currency (at the time at least) and domestic companies divesting from homegrown entities, India’s liberalization of its FDI policy in August is likely a key reason for the country’s increasing appeal. The Indian government, for seven sectors, decided to increase the amount of FDI that could be contributed to companies and eliminate mandatory government approval, under certain circumstances, in five other sectors. Such broad liberalizations in FDI-governing laws are just one among other strategies being used by Asian countries to attract foreign money.

More targeted relaxations are being employed by Mongolia to encourage inbound FDI specifically from Chinese investors. Laos’s leadership also used a focused approach a few weeks ago to solicit more FDI from South Korea’s private sector during a trip to Seoul. Many Asian countries, like Laos, see FDI as an important contributor to economic growth and are not afraid to go out and get it.

Longer-term bilateral approaches in the form of bilateral treaties and co-operation agreements are continuously being drafted as well, as in the case of Malaysia and China. In October, the two countries reaffirmed agreements to bilaterally trade USD $160B over the next five years, agreements which also include terms centered on common defense and security cooperation.

With China’s economy growing and prices for labor and services increasing, countries like Cambodia and Vietnam are likely to attract investments that will exploit relatively lower related costs (Samsung made its move just this month). And so continues the race to the bottom, where multinational companies encourage countries to compete over them. The country that can deregulate the most, often at the expense of local industries, seems to win.

Infusing foreign capital into countries that need it is important—I’m no fool. The ugly side, though, cannot be ignored—displacement of politically weak communities, ignoring of labor rights, and the degradation of ecological systems among other problems. Luckily we can all just rely on it all trickling down right?  That’s if the goal is being poor and exploited with one job rather than being relatively less poor with no job.

Links for more information

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/xinhua-news-agency/131126/laos-seeks-foreign-direct-investment-s-korea

http://www.mad-mongolia.com/news/mongolia-news/mongolias-new-law-expected-to-attract-chinese-billions-2-16337/

http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2013/10/05/china-malaysia-seek-to-strengthen-ties/

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2013/12/13/2003578891

http://www.dnaindia.com/money/interview-many-south-korean-companies-doing-surveys-to-invest-in-india-seok-gu-jang-1939923

[photo courtesy of ironline.american.edu]