{"id":381,"date":"2011-10-19T13:44:38","date_gmt":"2011-10-19T18:44:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hlsorgs.com\/bsa\/?page_id=381"},"modified":"2025-11-18T02:20:27","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T02:20:27","slug":"final-round","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/ames-competition\/final-round\/","title":{"rendered":"Ames Final Round"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Ames Competition is one of the most prestigious competitions for appellate brief writing and advocacy in the country. Students participating in the Final Round started the competition in the fall of their 2L year.  From there, two teams progress to the Final Round through their strong research abilities and excellent written and oral advocacy. The Final Round is traditionally judged by this country\u2019s preeminent jurists. Past Ames Competition winners include Professor Cass Sunstein, Dean Kathleen Sullivan, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, and Justice Harry Blackmun. Click here<\/a> for a list of past winners of the Competition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congratulations to The Honorable Charles Fried Memorial Team on winning Best Overall Team in the 2025 Ames Moot Court Final!<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

2025 Final Round<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

The Honorable Elizabeth Prelogar
<\/strong>Solicitor General of the United States (2021-2025)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Honorable Kevin Newsom
<\/strong>United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Honorable Leondra Kruger
<\/strong>Supreme Court of California<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Read the Parties’ Briefs:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Petitioner Brief<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Respondent Brief<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reply Brief<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Case \u2013 State of Ames v. Welles<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Daniel Welles is a serial entrepreneur whose ambition has always outstripped his ability. However, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, things appeared to be finally falling into place for him, as he had just finished converting an old gin distillery into a manufactory for hand sanitizer when the demand for hand sanitizer spiked. He was not, however, able to capitalize on his good timing. As part of the declaration of a public health emergency that accompanied the pandemic, the Governor of the State of Ames authorized the state hospital system to operate Welles\u2019 equipment for the State\u2019s public benefit. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

His equipment was returned to him, after the public health emergency ended, but his opportunity had passed. He was never paid for the use of his equipment, and Ames lacks either a statutory or common law mechanism for bringing a claim to rectify the taking of private property for public benefit. As a result, Welles sued Ames directly under the Fifth Amendment to the constitution, arguing that the Fifth Amendment provides its own cause of action for those seeking \u201cjust compensation\u201d and that it similarly effects a waiver of state sovereign immunity for such actions. The district court rejected both arguments and dismissed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Ames Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to resolve two questions: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u202f1.\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Whether the Fifth Amendment creates a self-executing cause of action to redress an alleged taking. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u202f2.\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars plaintiffs from seeking \u201cjust compensation\u201d directly under the Fifth Amendment from a State in federal court absent a waiver of sovereign immunity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Competitors<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The William Thaddeus Coleman Jr. Memorial Team (Petitioner)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n