{"id":244,"date":"2011-01-27T21:59:36","date_gmt":"2011-01-27T21:59:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hlsorgs.com\/bsa\/"},"modified":"2026-08-18T14:21:08","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T14:21:08","slug":"1l-ames","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/1l-ames\/","title":{"rendered":"1L Ames"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!-- 1L AMES page. Paste into the Custom HTML block on the 1L Ames page.\n     ANNUAL UPDATE: the two case cards (court, caption, and description) change each year. -->\n<div style=\"max-width:1060px;margin:0 auto;padding:0 20px;font-family:Georgia, serif;color:#1C1B19;line-height:1.62\">\n\n  <div style=\"text-align:center;padding:44px 0 24px\">\n    <div style=\"height:1px;background:#C7BEAD;max-width:120px;margin:0 auto\"><\/div>\n    <h1 style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-weight:400;line-height:1.05;font-size:48px;margin:20px auto 14px;color:#1C1B19\">First-Year Ames<\/h1>\n    <div style=\"height:1px;background:#C7BEAD;max-width:120px;margin:0 auto\"><\/div>\n    <p style=\"font-size:19px;line-height:1.6;color:#3B3A37;max-width:64ch;margin:22px auto 0\">The First-Year Ames Moot Court is the capstone of the <br> 1L Legal Research and Writing Program.<\/p>\n  <\/div>\n\n  <div style=\"padding:40px 0;border-top:1px solid #DFD8CB;margin-top:8px\">\n    <p style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-size:15px;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:.2em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#9E1B32;margin:0 0 8px\">About the Competition<\/p>\n    <h2 style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-weight:400;font-size:32px;margin:0 0 18px;line-height:1.15;color:#1C1B19\">Research, writing, and oral advocacy<\/h2>\n    <p style=\"color:#3B3A37;max-width:74ch;margin:0 0 16px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.6\"> All 1L students participate in First-Year Ames.<\/p>\n    <p style=\"color:#3B3A37;max-width:74ch;margin:0 0 16px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.6\">Students work in pairs to write briefs for a hypothetical appellate case. Climenko Fellows and BSAs guide students through legal research, brief writing, and preparation for oral argument.<\/p>\n    <p style=\"color:#3B3A37;max-width:74ch;margin:0;font-size:18px;line-height:1.6\">Briefs are graded by the Climenko Fellows. Students do not receive a formal grade for oral argument, but each pair receives feedback from a judging panel of faculty, practicing attorneys, and upper-level students.<\/p>\n  <\/div>\n\n  <div style=\"padding:40px 0;border-top:1px solid #DFD8CB\">\n    <h2 style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-weight:400;font-size:32px;margin:0 0 28px;line-height:1.1;color:#1C1B19;text-align:center\">Case Descriptions<\/h2>\n    <div style=\"background:#FCFBF8;border:1px solid #C7BEAD;border-top:3px solid #9E1B32;padding:26px 30px;margin:0 auto 20px;max-width:820px\">\n      <div style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-size:26px;font-style:italic;color:#1C1B19;text-align:center;line-height:1.25;margin-bottom:16px\">Concerned Citizens of Cairo v. Raiders<\/div>\n      <p style=\"font-size:16.5px;color:#3B3A37;line-height:1.65;margin:0\"><em>Concerned Citizens of Cairo v. Raiders<\/em> presents several appellate issues stemming from an international dispute over the spoils of an expedition conducted by Kentucky Jones and his company, Raiders and Associates. Concerned Citizens of Cairo (CCC) seeks the assistance of a federal court in the United States to aid its efforts in a court in England: under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1782, CCC has requested discovery of documents held by Raiders and Associates, though those documents are available only in hard copy in Brazil. Raiders contends that the District Court for the District of Massachusetts lacks jurisdiction to compel discovery from it. The district court split the two central questions, finding that it had jurisdiction but that the statute could not reach documents located abroad. On appeal, CCC asks the First Circuit to find jurisdiction over Raiders and to permit discovery of the Brazilian documents.<\/p>\n    <\/div>\n    <div style=\"background:#FCFBF8;border:1px solid #C7BEAD;border-top:3px solid #9E1B32;padding:26px 30px;margin:0 auto 20px;max-width:820px\">\n      <div style=\"font-family:Georgia, serif;font-size:26px;font-style:italic;color:#1C1B19;text-align:center;line-height:1.25;margin-bottom:16px\">Sanchez v. MacNamara Veterinary Specialists<\/div>\n      <p style=\"font-size:16.5px;color:#3B3A37;line-height:1.65;margin:0\"><em>Sanchez v. MacNamara Veterinary Specialists<\/em> arises from June Sanchez&#8217;s employment as a veterinarian at MacNamara Veterinary Specialists. After eight years, Sanchez resigned and opened her own practice in Syracuse. MacNamara brought a contract suit, alleging that the practice violated a restrictive covenant in Sanchez&#8217;s employment contract limiting her ability to practice in New York after leaving the hospital. Sanchez responded that the covenant was unenforceable and counterclaimed that the hospital had retaliated against her for reporting a colleague&#8217;s dangerous conduct, constructively discharging her in breach of the contract. The trial court granted MacNamara summary judgment, and the New York Court of Appeals granted review of two questions: whether the noncompete is enforceable, and whether Sanchez adequately pleaded a cause of action for breach of her employment contract.<\/p>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n\n  <div style=\"background:#1C1B19;color:#F3EFE7;padding:38px 32px;text-align:center;margin-top:40px\">\n    <p style=\"color:#C9C2B4;max-width:58ch;margin:0 auto 22px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.55\">The Board of Student Advisers maintains a collection of resources to support 1L students as they prepare their Ames briefs and oral arguments.<\/p>\n    <a href=\"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/1l-resource-library\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;font-family:Georgia, serif;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;background:#9E1B32;color:#ffffff;text-decoration:none;padding:13px 26px\">Visit the 1L Resource Library \u2192<\/a>\n  <\/div>\n\n  <div style=\"text-align:center;padding:26px 20px 8px;margin-top:12px\">\n    <p style=\"color:#3B3A37;font-size:16px;line-height:1.6;margin:0;font-style:italic\">Questions about First-Year Ames? Email the Ames Committee at <a href=\"mailto:amesHLS@gmail.com\" style=\"color:#9E1B32;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px solid #C7BEAD;padding-bottom:1px\">amesHLS@gmail.com<\/a> <br>or the LRW Committee at <a href=\"mailto:amesHLS@gmail.com\" style=\"color:#9E1B32;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px solid #C7BEAD;padding-bottom:1px\">hlsbsa.lrw@gmail.com<\/a>.<\/p><p><\/p>\n  <\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>First-Year Ames The First-Year Ames Moot Court is the capstone of the 1L Legal Research and Writing Program. About the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template-fullwidth.php","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"class_list":["post-244","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P5BJdO-3W","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3543,"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/244\/revisions\/3543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgs.law.harvard.edu\/bsa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}